Have you ever noticed that everything around you is constantly changing? Maybe more importantly, have you ever wondered why that change is taking place? For the longest time, in my formative years, I was educated to note change as a factual event. Sometimes, superficial descriptions of why some changes occurred were given, but seldom, if ever, was an in-depth analysis offered. For instance, those of us living in temperate and polar climes were made to take note of seasonal changes—longer, warmed days in summer, and shorter, colder days in winter. Similarly, we became aware that certain grasses and weeds stayed green and continued to grow in winter, while others turned brown and ceased to grow after repeated frosts began. We noted that, as the days got shorter, tree leaves lost their green luster, eventually turned brown, and dropped to the ground. We learned that a tree’s sap left its branches and trunk, and flowed down into its root system. Parenthetically, I was already a mature adult before it became apparent to me that even in tropical and sub-tropical areas, tree underwent a, more or less, continual replacement of their leaves. But, no one ever gave me an in-depth explanation of the ultimate cause of those changes. Any educated botanist could have easily given me a scientific explanation. However, very likely, none would have been able to give me a satisfactory philosophical basis for those changes. I will attempt to do so now.
We note literally thousands, maybe millions, of visible changes in our lifetime. We see changes in the size and position of the moon and other celestial bodies on a regular recurring basis. Archeologists, paleontologists, biologists, and a host of other ‘…ologists’ have made us aware that over the eons, we humans have evolved from quadrupeds to bipeds to Homo Sapiens. Our astute cosmologists, astrophysicists and mathematicians suggest to us that our entire universe is in a constant flux of change. We know from the science of chemistry and physics that billions of physicochemical changes are occurring on a moment to moment basis everywhere—why do you suppose that is? I would propose to you that it is God’s, deliberately created, imbalanced, nature attempting to balance its own scales, thereby generating a ‘selfish’ need.
To my knowledge, no scientist or philosopher has ever offered a foolproof explanation for the basic essential cause of change—I did, and I have. That explanation has its roots in my irrefutable definition of the essence of God: God is a Perfect Rational Being. That Perfect Rationality translates into Perfect Love. Perfect Love translates into a Perfect Need (a perfect lovee). That perfect lovee translates into an entire universe(s) of evil (selfishness). Selfishness translates into need, and need translates into change. If there were no need, there would be no change nor time—only eternity. God chose to demonstrate his Perfect Love by allowing a %100 evil universe of selfish need to come into existence so he could, simultaneously, ‘demonstrate’ and ‘be’ Perfect Love. Remember, love (acceptance) is an abstract concept. Active love requires ‘two to tango’— a lover and a lovee—enter Jesus.
Let’s consider a simple example of imbalance which equilibrates to selfish need. During its dormant state, a tree’s leaves cease to function—they stop absorbing CO2 and sunlight, the chemical laden sap departs them, and chlorophyll photosynthesis ceases—the leaves dry, turn brown and fall to the ground. The chemically supporting sap is already well on its way to the roots. In Springtime, when the days lengthen and temperatures warm, the tree awakens—it senses a sudden imbalanced demand for sap nutrients generated by the need of new buds which will eventually open into flowers and leaves. The flowers will form seed for reproduction, and the leaves will begin the process of photosynthesis which will support the overall growth and health of both the tree structure and the seed—and the cycle repeats itself annually until death. A similar process pertains in most living entities. It is that perpetual imbalance or disorder in the universe, known to scientists as entropy, which I believe God caused (willed) to happen so his universe could exist in a time/space framework of selfishness need, through which he could demonstrate his Perfect Love by the sacrificial death of his mirror image, Jesus.
Jesus did, in fact, tell us about God’s love—his only command was that we love our God with our all, and love our neighbor as ourselves—the self-serving Jewish hierarchy did not want to hear that. Love would have destroyed their ‘power base’ and their ‘money machine’—so, they killed him. They killed God’s mirror image, and our brother, because he told us who the ‘real God’ is. He knew they would—he tricked them into it. Thank God for his Perfect Love through Jesus.
We are now two thousand years past Jesus and his heroic death for us— has anything changed?—not that I can tell— Jesus’ mandate of love has been totally ignored. Religion is just as it was then—self-serving, controlling, gilt purveying, money machine. Remember Jesus’ overturning the money-changer’s tables? Wouldn’t it be nice if Jesus were here now?—probably not nice for him—very likely, he’d get killed again.
It is a general given that change is commonly resisted—we selfish humans become too comfortable with ‘having it our way’. However, it behooves us to be ever aware that change is God ordained, and for a very specific purpose—our salvation—any questions?
You will find the explicit answer to any and all relevant questions in my two little books, Wilderness Cry and Peace in Spirituality.
What is a framer? A framer may be defined as anyone who forms or creates a plan, structure, working system, or concept upon which additional entities may be added. Some common examples would be: the framers of our constitution, who created the basic set of rigorous concepts upon which amendments could be added without changing the basic framework; in construction, we speak of ‘framing a house or other type building’, which means erecting the supporting skeleton upon which additional amenities such as plumbing, electrical, dry-wall, siding, etc. may be added; a picture-framer is one who makes rigid structures designed to support and/or display photographs, paintings, drawings, and the like—as a sidelight, when in med school during the summer of 1956, between my sophomore and junior years, I got a job making picture frames in Saint Louis, Mo— I could cut the pieces and assemble 500, 10″x12″, frames in an eight hour day—I got paid $0.05/each; in the case of more advanced living things, each has a supporting framework of bone or cartilage upon which its flesh and vitals are attached.
There are literally thousands of ways the word, framer, might be used, but the one I want to address today are the framers of religion. There are many known historical facts regarding such activity. As far as I can determine, the Egyptians are given credit for devising (framing) the first documented deity worship (religion).
So, what is religion? It is a ritualistic practice aimed at honoring, worshiping, and/or appeasing a presumed higher power (god). Noticing both good and bad events in their lives, the Egyptians attempted to explain those occurrences as being due to the influence of that/those power(s). They reasoned that those powers resided in, or were manifested in celestial bodies such as the sun, moon and stars. They connected the dots of certain stars to form twelve animal characters which were arranged in a circular pattern and the Zodiac was recognized. Seemingly, most of their religious understanding and practices emanated from that framework.
Without going into too much detail, according to the Greek historian, Herodotus (c. 484-425/413 BCE), the first recognized Egyptian god was a ‘bearded old creature’ named Geb. He was considered to be the primeval King of Egypt. He had a god-son Osiris and a god-grandson Horus. Osiris, was killed by by his god-brother, Set. Geb was also described as father of the mythological snake-goddess Nehebkau of primeval times. After Orisis died, he arose after three days. Geb then turned the throne over to Orisis (the Sun-Son). Geb then took over the role of Judge in the Divine Tribunal of Gods. It should be noted, however, that there were many ‘lesser’ gods’ who had specific functions. The Holy Ghost was vaguely recognized as the ‘life-imparting breath’ of some gods.
Later on, the Egyptians reasoned that the misfortunes they experienced in their lives must be due to their god-displeasing deeds. Therefore, their angry gods must be appeased—a scapegoat must be offered to those angry gods. That unfortunate critter usually was a bull, but may be any one of several animals. However, not just any animal would suffice—it must be a ‘perfect’ specimen. After a thorough examination to ascertain that perfection, it was selected . After first cutting the animal’s throat, it was then beheaded—the head was then mounted on a pole and sold to any Hellenes(Greeks) present; if none were present, it was cast into the Nile with the expectation that all evil spirits went with it. The remaining carcus, after due preparation, was burned as a sacrificial offering—a religion was thus framed. In addition, the Egyptians had already established Baptism—a ritual cleansing in the waters of the Nile river.
Now, fast forward to the great famine which prompted the Israelites to seek food from the Egyptians. Because they had no other recourse, the Israelites allowed themselves to be enslaved by the Egyptians for forty years. It seem without doubt that ,during those forty years, the Israelites accepted and adopted the Egyptian framework of worship as their own for their ‘sacrificial religion’ of appeasement of their ‘angry God’. In addition, the Hebrews also adopted the practice of ‘baptism’.
We all know the story of how ‘sin’ was created by Moses in order to control his subjects. His commands for good life and living were ignores by his flock. He lacked sufficient clout—after all, he was a murderer, and they knew it—how could he preach to them? So, he had to make the ultimate claim that such a framework for good living was a ‘direct order’ from God—any breacher would be severely punished by God.
As a sidelight, has anyone ever wondered about the Biblical story in Exodus concerning the Israelites ignoring Moses commands, and reverting to worshiping the ‘golden calf’. Remember, the Israelites were near starvation, having to depend on mana (a sort of hoarfrost) for their existence. How and where were they able to acquire the resources necessary to find, melt, and mold a golden calf?—mind you, they were in a desolate desert. You don’t suppose some ‘dreamer’ was attempting to frame a picture to ‘his liking’ when he wrote that story, do you?
Now, lets fast-forward again to the Nazarene, Jesus. He was a traitor to the Hebrew religion. They had adopted the Egyptian playbook (framework) of appeasing a vengeful God by making ‘perfect’ offerings to him. Just as the Egyptians, not just any ‘Tom, Dick, or Harry’ could make those offerings or, even, provide them —it could only be done by the High Priest, and always at the price of a ‘pretty penny’. Such a framework was soooo lucrative for the Jewish ‘royalty’. Jesus readily recognized the fallacy in such ‘pagan’ exercises, he also understood the ultimate cynicism demonstrated in their performance—‘all pigs are equal, but some are more equal than others’.
Jesus taught that the only thing needed and required was Love—he commanded us to love our ‘One True God’, and to love our neighbor—that framework got him killed. Jesus despised religion. Jesus condemned no one. He commanded his apostles to go into the world and tell them the ‘good news’ (gospel)—and what was that good news?—‘that I have come to die for you as the one and only ultimate sacrifice in atonement for your sins’—relax, be joyous, be happy—give thanks to your God for my sacrifice on your behalf—that is the only ‘Gospel’.
Now, we hasten to fast-forward to the year 325AD. The Roman Empire was in chaos because or infighting among the so-called Christians. Each group was attempting to frame Jesus’ teachings differently, and why?—either they didn’t understand or they didn’t care, but ultimately, it was for the benefit of the Bishops. Emperor Constantine, recognizing the reason for that mass conflagration, called the Bishops into conclave at Nicaea. Once assembled, he commissioned them to frame a religion of ‘their liking’—it would become the official religion of the entire Roman Empire. They did and it was—the official Catholic (universal) Church was born.
I will submit to you that the Church framers have twisted, turned, and asqued that frame incessantly since its beginning. However, parts of that framework have persisted, and have never deviated—Hierarchal control, sacrificial rites, and Baptism—straight off the blueprint of the Egyptian-Hebrew framers—a complete mockery of Jesus.
I know, without doubt, those words ‘burn a lot of ears’—no rational person wants to admit he has been duped—but duped we have been. Remember the old saying, “It’s the truth that hurts.”? It certainly does, but we must take it like a dose of ‘Castor oil’—otherwise, we, as a living entity, are doomed—likely, not we old dudes , but our children and their progeny—I sincerely feel for them. Just glance over your shoulder at the world around you—there are a multitude of framers busying themselves constructing a cage framework of enslavement for you all of humanity.
We, in this country are so divided by our petty differences, most of which are based on long-standing religious biases, that we, as a nation, are becoming emasculated by the minute. To make matters worse many of our European allies present an air of ‘la belle indifference’—the exact attitude which convinced Hitler he could destroy them—he did.
No one before me, except Jesus, has ever conclusively and completely defined (framed) the essence of God. Jesus told us that God, our Father, is all love and all truth. That understanding demands that God knows all, and accepts all. I framed that definition thus: God is a Perfect Rational Being. That definition completely frames God—a perfect picture. It translates into a Living Being who knows all Truth because he created it, and he Loves (accepts) all Truth because he created it. If you can add or subtract from the definition rationally, I will gladly accept and ‘stand corrected’—I’m waiting.
All religions, known to me, which admits to my definition, admits to their ‘total lack of meaningful purpose’—all have a ‘self-serving purpose’—power, money, control. That framework, and those framers are gradually destroying any chance of humanity’s self-directed survival.
The cage-makers are watching—they’re biding their time—I sense it’s getting near—the hatred and divisiveness in this country are almost unbearable. We are the only protectors of the ‘free world’—when we go down, everyone goes down. The atmosphere in this country, right this minute, may be likened to two tumble-bugs struggling with each other over a dung-ball, whilst being never-aware of the horse’s hoof poised above them, about to squash them into eternity—ultimately, because of indoctrination into religion, which is rooted in mythology, astrology and superstition from fourteen thousand years ago.
Does anyone understand that we must become united in our acceptance of God’s essence? That union would, indeed, destroy the ‘religion-based’ economy—it would, however, save us, our economy, and the world.
Where is Jesusand Love?
If you have any doubts or concerns about what I just said, I sincerely urge you to read my two little books, Wilderness Cry, and Peace in Spirituality.
Every rational being knows what balance means. That word may have have multiple connotations but only one basic understanding and that is ‘equilibrium’. We may speak of balance in hundreds of different ways but always with the same ultimate meaning—well rounded, stable, equal on both sides etc. When we weigh something on a set of scales, what are we doing—we’re determining the weight of the object by measuring how much weight would need to be added to the other side in order to balance the scales. Likewise, everyone knows what ‘imbalance’ means. When something is imbalanced or ‘out of balance’ it is unsteady in it’s approach, unequal to an opposing force, unequal to the opposite side of an equation etc.
A very common example of balance/imbalance is two kids playing on a see-saw—one may be much heavier than the other—a total imbalance—what are they going to do. I’d vouch to say that even seven year-olds, would reason to the proper solution rather quickly. Instinctively they would experiment with changing the pivot point of the board until a proper balance was achieved. Unwittingly, they would be doing a ‘lever arm’ experiment in classical, physics—they won’t do any calculations— they will simply experiment until they ‘get it right; and on they would go, see-sawing away.
We know from observation that balance negates change—two equal forces applied in opposite directions cancel each other completely. Consider this; if the universe in which we live were completely balanced, it would be at a complete stand-still—there would be no time—only eternity.
We do know that our universe has ‘entropy’ which is another way of saying it has ‘disorder’ or ‘imbalance’. I have defined the essence of our universe’s creator as ‘A Perfect Rational Being’ which we call by many names—God, in the Christian world—but by hundreds, maybe thousands, of different names elsewhere and at other times.. We also know that every gravid object in existence is composed of identical, perfect particles of energy, which, by virtue of their perfection, already do, and always have, existed in eternity. So, why does ‘entropy’ exist?
I can explain why it exists on a ‘philosophical’ basis, but not on a ‘mathematical and quantum’ basis—I’m not smart enough. By that I mean, I’m not educated enough—likely, no one is yet. However, on a philosophical basis, I am proposing a scientific hypothesis, which by the way, may already have been advanced. It is this:
Without in any way attempting to explain or understand its quantum specifics. I am proposing a scientific hypothesis that the ‘particle universe’ exists in a state of ‘perfect imbalance’. That imbalance accounts for the existence of our ‘visible universe’ which exists in a state of change (time). It also accounts for the presence of ‘black holes’ which, presumably, will eventually coalesce into one singularity—a state of perfect balance with no change possible.Only our Perfect rational being could ever make that determination. We call that being God—unwittingly, others call, and have called, it by hundreds of different names—a rose by any other name is still a rose.
The fact that we and every living thing are here, alive and changing; the fact that every celestial body is in a state of continuous change, either by motion or combustion, demonstrates clearly the state of imbalance (entropy) in the universe. In the absence of entropy, the universe would be frozen in time—a state of eternity. I’ll necessarily have to leave the specifics of how and why that all works to the super-scientists who investigate such matters.
Then, of course, there is the complicating, poorly understood, subject of dark matter and dark energy. Some day, some bright person will elucidate their meaning—more of God’s perfection will be known and understood for the absolute truth that it is. I am compelled to remind you again that the word ‘science’ comes from the Latin word ‘scientia’, which means knowledge—knowledge is ‘truth’—truth is God.
I believe we should thank God with our every living breath for scientists, the ‘truth-seekers’—imagine what life would be like if we were to revert to the year 4,000 BC, or even 1,500 AD—what about 1900 AD. We knew literally nothing of major benefit to human existence compared with today, and guess what—we haven’t even scratched the surface of understanding God’s Perfection.
Anyone who has read my two philosophy books, Wilderness Cry and Peace in Spirituality, knows that I have completely disclaimed and discredited the mythical God presented to us in the Bible. That so-called God was a string-pulling puppeteer, who could and would change his mind in a split second, and, furthermore, do so on a whim. I have never known such a God—I tried because it was demanded of me. It was chocked down my throat, so to speak, by religious zealots who didn’t know any better—they had swallowed it a long time before I. But, I gagged on it—that wasn’t my God. I knew it wasn’t ‘my God’ but it took me forever to find the ‘real God’—the Perfectly Rational One. As I understand more and more about our existence and the universe in which it is taking place, the puzzle is gradually coming together for me. I am delighted to share it with any and all who care to look and listen.
VICTIM–Now here’s a word that usually describes unwanted and/or undesired consequences of an act, or the words and workings of someone else, or some circumstance. We hear of victimization in many, many different ways. One of the most common modes is the bilking of old folks out of their money by scammers. Another is the beating and robbery of old people. Again, we hear that a family or community was the victim of a natural disaster such as a flood, tornado, hurricane, earthquake, tsunami and the likes.
We are well aware that children, especially, are extremely vulnerable to becoming psychological victims of bullying, or faulty guidance by ill-prepared parents and teachers. In addition, incest, which leaves permanent psychic scars, seems to still be a rather common cause of victimization in some areas . In that same vein, damage done to children’s psyches by pedophile clergy is being reported at a rather staggering rate.
All of the aforementioned are terrible, indeed. However, on a scale of one to ten, each of them pales in the shadow of the victimization of entire nations by tyrannical governments. Here in the United States, black Africans were severely victimized by unscrupulous slave traders—I use the word unscrupulous advisedly because I cannot imagine a single, level headed, and psychologically stable, human being accepting such behavior as good and desirable. However that culture has obviously been condoned as the norm throughout recorded history. Ancient history, as well as the Bible is loaded with slave events and customs. The captors seemed always to ‘be entitled’ to enslave their captives.
Neither was that entitlement an isolated occurrence—it had the universal backing and support of religion. Recently, I had the privileged of reading the proclamations of most Protestant church conclaves during the pre-abolition days—without exception each agreed that they had biblical backing for condoning slavery— without exception, each did. In retrospect, it was all about power, control and, most importantly, money. The Catholic Church, which has condoned slavery throughout its history, has remained mostly silent about slavery during my eighty seven years. In fact Catholic religious orders were famous for owning slaves. I might interject that one Papal edict did point out that it was immoral to enslave another Christion, but OK to enslave all others—what a cop-out and cover-up. So, its easy to understand the mind-set of both slave traders an slave owners.
Seemingly, on nearly a daily basis, we hear stories of war-torn nation’s mass killings and/ or enslavement of their countries’ residents. Some of those activities have been proclaimed as genocide. Without doubt, we could say with absolute certainty that the entire earth has been unbelievably victimized by the release of the Covid-19 virus—a monstrous plague. Who would do such a thing and for what reason? It seems rather obvious that, if done by a ‘nation controlled entity’, it would have been done to weaken its rivals—what a shame, if done accidentally—‘those who play with fire will get burned’.
So, what does all of that have to do with ‘victim, victims, and victimization’?—I say, everything.
Consider the plight of slave families here in the USA when, finally, they were freed—they owned nothing, probably not even the ragged clothes on their backs. What were they going to do?—they had no money, no food, no water, no transportation, and no shelter—they has nothing. If I remember history well, it was for that very reason, that many requested staying on with their masters—my understanding is that many did. Be that as it may, all black people were ordered to be segregated from others. That situation remained in place for essentially one hundred years. I submit to you that the psychological effect that segregation had on black people was and is devastating—can you imagine an unassuming child, suddenly realizing that it is inferior to others by virtue of its skin color—I can’t, but I do.
Blacks, at best, were considered “lower class’—they lived on the ‘other side of the tracks’. Hence they were forced into low class neighborhoods—in larger cities, ghettoes were born. History shows that there have been many, many great black citizens who have risen above and out of their psychological prison, and became upright, forthright equal citizens—they were able to shed the shackles of victimization—a daunting task, to say the least. That process has been slow, indeed—it might be likened to the task of a single diesel engine attempting to pull twenty five loaded coal cars up Sherman Hill—creeping at a snail’s pace.
The net effect of all that financial and psychological poverty, mainly in the ghettoes, is the innate feeling of victimization, which, I believe was justified in its inception. However it is being perpetuated by unscrupulous preachers and politicians for purposes of their own personal gain. Dr. Martin Luther King pleaded peacefully for the end of segregation. He was killed for that. However, his call was grudgingly heeded, and overt segregation ended—psychological segregation persists for a very specific reason.
Along with the feeling of victimization has come political brainwashing with the idea of entitlement. Politicians, both black and white, alike, realizing black’s plight, have repeatedly, for at least fifty years, made promises of entitlement just to garner votes—they have gotten the votes, and the plight of the ghettoes has worsened by the day. Family structure has collapsed—drug use and crime has exploded—indiscriminate cold-bloodied murder has skyrocketed.
When I was in medical school in St Louis, Mo., in 1957, my family and I lived in a government housing project, called the Darst apartments—it was located directly across the street from the City Hospital where I spent most of my Junior and Senior year’s clinical education time, as well where I served a rotating internship after graduating medical school in 1958. The apartment was very handy, cheap and ‘all white’. A similar facility, called the Igo-Pruit complex, had been constructed a few years earlier for poor blacks. To, my dismay, there was a reported killing in those apartments daily. I can’t recall the exact time-frame, but I believe that it was about four years later that the city tore down the Igo-Pruit complex because of the crime.
However, before their demolition, as a senior med student with no income, I worked for a small Life Insurance Company doing physicals exams on people in their homes—I was paid $10 per exam. Most of the people I examined lived in the Igo-Pruit complex. I considered myself to be both brave and stupid, but also desperate for income. As each door I knocked on opened, I was consistently confronted by someone holding a whiskey bottle, a baseball bat or a gun pointing at me. In addition each greeter consistently showed a look of unbelievable shock and surprise as he viewed me—what on earth could a stupid ‘white boy’ be doing here? After explaining the purpose of my visit, I was always graciously invited to enter and complete my business. I’ll guarantee you that, had I not been desperate to feed and clothe my wife and two children, I wouldn’t have been there. I did at least two hundred such exams, and I always wondered why/how such poor people would/could be buying life insurance. I think I know now—they feared for their own lives and the financial security of their families.
Fast forward to today. We have innumerable black athletes, who have suddenly become multi, multi, millionaires, repeatedly giving us and our nation ‘the finger, and the ultimate show of cynicism, by taking the knee at the playing of our national anthem. Mind you, not one of us have ever owned a slave, but many of us have worn the uniform of that nation, under whose flag we served to protect them, and make it possible for them to become millionaires. The constitution over which that flag presides guarantees each of us the same entitlement—the right to try.
No doubt, that ‘trying’ has been much more difficult for those victimized by ghetto-life than for those raised in the suburbs—I personally was raised on a small dirt farm in a three room shack with no electricity. That fact, alone, makes their achievement much more laudable. Most honest people greatly admire their accomplishments, however, their feats are sullied by ‘taking the knee’. I submit to you that any one of them, who had ever worn the uniform of that flag, would feel honored to stand and show reverence for our flag and their country. I may be wrong, but I believe that they are free to go to Africa to live—I’m not aware of any mass exodus.
So, what is my point? It’s this: yes, black people were victims of slavery—yes, blacks were victims of segregation— yes blacks have been/are victims of psychological brainwashing with feelings of inferiority perpetuated by preachers and politicians alike—and yes, those brainwashers are the scallywags responsible for the perpetuation of those feelings of victimization.
In our current state of affairs, very few black children are allowed to develop without indoctrination into those ideas and feelings—and why? In my opinion, it is for the political and financial gain of the indoctrinators—preachers and politicians. They are the ones profiting from the victimization of their constituents—power, control, money.
Solution? Preachers must promote a concept of stable marriage, or at least a stable relationship, so that children may grow and develop with stable attitudes, which can only come from both male and female influences. Politicians must stop making promises of entitlements which they cannot deliver. They must, however, introduce bills of incentivization. That would include properly trained social workers who would instruct and encourage parents and children alike in the value of education—they would learn that it is only through education that they can rise from the ghetto-squalor, and become a self-sufficient, upright, respectable and respected citizen—then, and only then can they have a true sense of self respect, as well as respect for others—then, and only then, can they command the respect of others. Politicians must pass legislation aimed at making all education levels, not only possible, but desirable. Those legislators must resist the temptation to ‘give each black person a fish every day’. They must, however, assist in the ‘procurement of a fishing pole for each of them, combined with teaching each of them the skill of using it’. Then , and only then, will they become self-sufficient, proud citizens. Then, and only then, will they have self-respect, and , simultaneously, respect for others—then, and only then, will they ‘command’ the respect of people of all colors.
The BLMs and the ‘kneelers’ are demanding respect—they will never get it—respect never comes by ‘demand’—it only comes by forthrightness—one who shows due respect will certainly command it, no matter what the color. Just look at some of the famous black athletes of the past. They were graceful in their greatness—-Bob Gibson, Lou Brock, Don Newcombe, Jackie Robinson, Hank Aaron, Willy Mays, just to name a few. They were giving no one the finger. They were not kneeling at the playing of out national anthem—they were grateful and thankful for their success. They never felt like victims, and, guess what—they were respected—they commanded respect—they never demanded it—consequently, and more importantly, they were loved. How desperately we need their attitude today.
While I did not directly address the plight of victimization in my two books, Wilderness Cry and Peace in Spirituality, I do address the plight of one victim, Jesus. I show how Jesus teachings have been twisted by knaves to, not only kill him, but more importantly, promote their own status and stature through politics and religion, all for power, money, and control.
Victimization of one human by another seems, almost always, in some way or another, to be about the same things— power, control, and ultimately, money.. Anyone who conscientiously reads my books and accepts their basic philosophy, could never victimize anyone—God couldn’t.
1-Slavery of any kind by anyone is always immoral and inhumane.
2-Slavery has been part of the ‘accepted human culture‘ throughout recorded history.
Ancient history is rife with stories of one or another king or ruler conquering and enslaving others. The old Testament tells us that very likely, the ‘Brown’ people of the Middle East, North Africa and Europe were descendants of slave women who were impregnated by their more-white owners/masters. That same Old Testament tells us that the entire Hebrew tribe was enslaved by the Egyptians for a period of forty years. Furthermore, the New Testament makes many references to how slaves must graciously succumb to their master’s wishes.
One such admonition is found in Paul’s letter to the Ephesians, 6: 5-7—“Slaves, obey your human master with the reverence, the awe, and the sincerity you owe to Christ. Do not render service for appearance only and to please men, but do God’s will with your whole heart as slaves of Christ. Give your service willingly, doing it for the Lord rather then men”. Similar statements are found in Col.3: 22-25, 1 Tim, 6:1-7,and Titus, 2: 9-10
In 1 Peter, 2: 18-21, we read: “You household salves, obey your masters with all deference, not only the good and reasonable ones, but also the ones who are harsh. When a man can suffer injustice and endure hardship through his awareness of God’s presence, this is the work of the grace of him. If you do wrong and get beaten for it, what credit can you claim? But if you put up with suffering for doing what is right, this is acceptable in God’s eyes. It was for this you were called, since Christ suffered for you in just this way and left you an example, you must follow in his footsteps.”
So, it goes without saying that any rational, reasonable, person would make the rather obvious observation that, in the Abrahamic religions of Judaism and Christianity, the end did justify the means—I plead ignorance about Islam’s relationship to slavery. By that, I mean that religious leaders and writers framed that accepted ‘social norm” as being a God-ordained principle—how convenient. In general, slavery has been the accepted norm as a ‘God ordained’ principle forever. Then we have to ask ourselves, “Is that what God really wants, or are we ‘putting words into God’s mouth’ just to suit our own desires—I think the latter. It seems quite obvious to me that slavery was justified and condoned for one simple reason—power, control and money (riches). Those who ‘created God and God’s word’ seemingly have never, even to this day, had a problem with dehumanizing a particular group of homo sapiens. Neither have they ever had any problem at all of dehumanizing everyone’s sexuality for that exact, same reason—power, money, control.
I have attended Roman Catholic Mass weekly for eighty five years, mostly in Kentucky, but also in Florida, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Missouri, Indiana, Arizona, Michigan, Texas and Tennessee. At no time, at any of these services, have I ever heard a single utterance against slavery. Likewise, I have listened to dozens of Sunday Televangelists of one denomination or another—again, not a single mention of slavery and its evils.
If I were to live to be ten thousand years old, I would never forget the feeling of dis-belief and dismay I experienced when in February, 1962, my wife and I crossed the Kentucky-Tennessee line for the first time on our way to Memphis—I was going for an interview to join the orthopedic training program of the famous Campbell Clinic. Every public building of any kind was marked with big, bold lettering: Black Only or White Only—we had never seen that before, and I had previously gone to college in Austin, Texas nine years before. To say I was shocked would be a gross understatement.
I had grown up in a three-room shack with no electricity, and with the Illinois Central Freight Line running eighty feet from my front door. Pre-WW2, we were in the throes of the great depression. Freight trains, loaded with starving hobos, both black and white, frequently stopped in front of our little hut to set off carloads of coal at a local side switch near Fancy Farm, Kentucky. Invariably, they hastily came knocking at our door asking for food. My mother always fed them whatever meager supplies we had left from previous meal. Mind you, we never went hungry—we had our own little thirty acre farm and grew and preserved nearly everything we ate. I’ll never forget the remorse and pity I felt for them. Not one of them ever threatened us in any way—they were so grateful for our generosity.
So, when I saw those segregation signs in South Fulton, TN, I was bewildered. As it so happened, I did get accepted into the Campbell Clinic starting July 1, 1962. We had not been in Memphis a month when ‘all hell broke loose’—James Meredith had integrated Ole Miss in Oxford MS, a mere sixty five miles from Memphis— I thought the world was coming to an end. I was wise enough to keep my mouth shut at the time, not that I wanted to—it would have been total futility—I was outnumbered one thousand to one.
I had been around black people all my life, working in tobacco fields, strawberry patches, moving houses and the like. To me they were just ordinary, hardworking, kind-hearted people—I had no expectations of anything more or less. During my six years of medical education in Saint Louis, most of my hospital time was spent in the charity institutions of the City and County hospitals. I had occasion to care for thousands of destitute black and white people—my heart went out to them all.
Several years back, when I began in earnest to analyze religion in general, and God specifically, I came to the startling realization that religion was, and always had been, the main instigator and propagator of slavery. About that same time, one evening, while at dinner with Protestant friends, I brought up that observation in our conversation. Immediately, all but one of them jumped up and, with an air of righteous indignation, departed our table with the speed expected as though a fifteen foot long cobra snake was about to strike them. I was astonished—I had anticipated a good, meaningful, conversation about such an important subject.
One must ask, then, where such ideation came from. After careful consideration, I have concluded, that, just as with all other considerations concerning the Abrahamic religions, it all started with the false narrative that ‘the Jews were God’s chosen people’. It did, in fact, take me a long time (50-60 years) before I got the ‘dimmer switch’ fully turned up—the Jews had ‘created’ their own God just like they wanted him. Three hundred years after Jesus’ death, the Christian Bishops did likewise, while adding several, self-serving, twists—they didn’t dare touch slavery. Well, guess what, when Martin Luther got his ‘belly full’ of Catholic hierarchy abuses, he bolted the pack—he opened the flood-gates, so that now, there are thirty three thousand so-called Christian denominations in the world (as of 2014). Not a single one, that I’m aware of, except the Black Churches, has ever openly condemned slavery. Mind you, legal slavery was abolished in this country in 1865.
Physical slavery in this country is illegal—mental and emotional enslavement seems to be alive and well. It comes in all sizes, shapes, descriptions, and colors, and, again, seems to be inexorably intertwined with religion and politics—people and organizations striving to control our minds and emotions for their own gain.
There is an old saying that ‘a house built on a weak foundation is destined to fall’. Martin Luther King ‘had a dream’—so did I. Literally, I was afraid to awaken for fear the dream would vanished—it did. In my sight of observation, what we are witnessing right this minute is an entanglement of false feelings and ideas most of which are being fostered by both religion and politics. The absolute fact is this: there is not a citizen alive in the United States of America who ever owned a slave—neither is there a person alive who ever was a slave. However, the narrative continues under the guise of racism. Our current Vice President claims to be descended from a Jamaican slave—I have little doubt that she used that claim to garner ‘sympathy votes’. Please allow me to explain that entanglement.
For starters, little children know no color or race—they do not know that they are white, black, brow, tan, or red. They learn from their teachers that they may be a certain color, and ,more importantly, that their color may matter. And, who is doing the teaching?—early on, their parents and, possibly teachers, who have been biased by ill-intentioned politicians and clergy. Later on, as they advance in age, they cannot possibly avoid the constant cacophony of alleged racism being spewed from every TV and radio station in the country, to say nothing of so-called social media rancor over the subject.
Politicians discovered at least seventy five years ago that racism was most beneficial for their purpose of staying in power. If you can convince people that they are being discriminated against, then you have created a ’cause’ in their minds. If you can teach people that they are being ‘disentitled’ on the one hand, or, better still, ‘entitled’ on the other, you have thusly created a following. Of course, the politicians are right there to guarantee those entitlements will be honored. History shows that thy seldom have been—the narrative thrives just the same.
In the case of religion, we see Catholic and Protestant missionaries alike constantly attempting to, both ‘protect their turf’, and enlarge it by proselytizing each other’s constituents. In the case of immigration, it is quite obvious that the official, unspoken Catholic Church position is for ‘open borders’. There is a subtle reason for that position. Church attendance in the US is dropping precipitously as more and more young people are finding religion irrelevant. The majority of immigrants across our southern border are Catholic and have been indoctrinated to attend Catholic services regularly. The supposition is that, even though most are paupers upon arrival, most would eventually find meaningful jobs—the collection baskets would once more be filled. The objectors to such illegal activity are labeled ‘xenophobes’—politicians, both governmental and religious, surely know well how to ‘play that game’.
There are millions of good, red-blooded Americans of all colors, races, and creeds who recognize all of that activity for exactly what it is—a political charade. The horrible part is that it benefits no one but the perpetrators. The plight of the unfortunate followers becomes worsened, and , worse yet, our nation is so divided so as, seemingly, to be on the verge of civil war—what a pity.
The only way out of this mess is through education coupled with dedication to hard work and self-determination. We are a most generous nation on earth—there is hardly one among us who would not ‘give the shirt off of his back’ to a truly needy person who, through no fault of his/her own, got caught in the trap of misfortune. Likewise, not many, but fools, would keep buying shirts for someone who ‘expected’ a new shirt every day just for the asking, while making no attempt to provide for himself. The American way is ‘hard work, self determination, and love of God and neighbor’. Love of neighbor means many things, among which are encouragement and education. There’s an old, so true, saying; “Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime”.
As a nation, we face a terribly important dilemma—how to motivate people to strive for self-sufficiency. How can we possibly reach our deprived children with appropriate education when millions have no parents with proper understandings. How can they become properly educated when their teachers refuse to teach history as it happened. How can we possibly ‘get inside their minds’ and teach them individual ‘personal respect’, when black athletes who are making more money in one year than I, as a hard-working, dedicated physician, made in a lifetime, are constantly spewing the narrative that the world ‘owes them something’. What the world owes them and every ‘them’ is the opportunity to try—then try, they must. There’s another old saying that is so true; “You can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make him drink”. I earnestly wish we could just get a bridle on him—I’d gladly find a waterhole and, at least, give him a chance to drink.
Racism and perceived racism generated, long past, by centuries of slavery will not die easily. Those athletes, making millions, annually, for playing with a ball, stupidly and unwittingly think they can ‘demand respect’. If they ever learn that no one gains respect by ‘demand’. Anyone can ‘command’ respect by showing kindness and respect, and by leading graciously and gratefully by good example—Dr. Martin Luther King did. So do thousands of other black athletes, business men, and yes, even politicians, whom I witness daily. Those who spew a venom of hate and self-righteousness may think they’re ‘helping the cause’—my firm belief is they know better—they’re doing it for the selfish, self-serving cause of power, control , and, above all, money. In my humble opinion, we need many more Herschel Walkers and fewer Al Sharptons in our world. We need ‘motivators’, not ‘demeanors and detractors’. We need teachers who tickle our minds with the eagerness to know truth. Proper history is truth. Adult aged children need to know the history of slavery world-wide. They need to know that the fundamental ‘justification’ for its existence is to be found in religion—they need to know that the fundamental cause of its perpetuation in the form of ‘perceived racism’ is religion and politics. Their minds need to be stimulated with the desire to know science and the basic philosophy of psychology and logical thinking. Then, and only then will the perception of racism disappear.
I personally know of no rational white person who does not hold in great esteem any successful black or white person who isn’t arrogant—white people in general know how difficult it has been for most black kids to rise up from the ghettoes and ‘be somebody’. The arrogance of so many black athletes is appalling. It is very likely that none of them have worn the uniform of our US military, and proudly laid their lives on the line in defense of our country, like I and my five brothers have done—we did so that those black athletes could ‘take the knee’ during the playing of our national anthem. I suspect that if they knew the real truth, they would be taking the knee in front of every church building in America. George Washington, et. al., didn’t invent slavery and racism—they ‘inherited it’ through their religion.
The basic philosophy I present here today didn’t just happen—its been a lifetime endeavor of observation, questioning, investigation, analysis, conclusion. It is all neatly wrapped up in my two little books, Wilderness Cry and Peace in Spirituality.
SPIRIT–Now, here’s an interesting word that is used with many different connotations. One of the most common, of course, is the Holy Spirit. In the not too distant past, the Holy Spirit was referred to as the Holy Ghost. Quite obviously, since no one has ever seen a ghost, each person will likely have a different image or understanding of a ghost. They might even think of a ghost as a goblin or, conversely, as an angel. Whatever the case, each person has a different ideation.
Another less common, but fairly often, use is in describing a person’s demeanor or approach to a specific subject, usually a sport. For instance, we may sometimes hear someone say something like, “she sure has spirit”, or “that sure is a spirited horse”, or “he has drive (spirit) like there’s no tomorrow”, etc.
Many liquor store marques read, “Beer–Wine–Spirits”. Of course, what those Spirits refer to is high content alcoholic beverages such as whiskey, gin, vodka and the likes. The early Native Americans had a special name for them—they called them Firewater—I wonder why.
In most instances, what we are referring to when we say spirit is drive or driving force. That force may be applied in both directions, either as repelling, like a bat striking a ball, or attracting, such as a magnet. That drive can be ‘stored or dormant’ such as electricity in batteries. Energized electric lines stand ready to deliver the full spirit or drive of their current flow—all they need in order for it to be applied is for someone to open the gate (switch).
The spirit I want to address, specifically, today is love, which falls into the category of ‘magnet-like’, attractive, forces—love is acceptance. When we say, ‘I love you’, what we’re really saying is, ‘I accept you’—my spirit accepts yours. Love is the exact opposite of hate which is a force of rejection and repelling. Synonyms for spirit are love, will, choose, accept. Now lets apply that concept to the Holy Ghost (Spirit).
As many of you know, I have defined the essence of God: God is a Perfect Rational Being. That definition demands that God exist in Trinity form. Please allow me to explain. Before there was time, God existed in eternity in a state of ‘stored energy’ known as the Singularity. However, with his perfect intellect, he reflected inwardly and saw a mirror image of himself—perfect in all respects (the Son). Then, there were two Perfect Intellects viewing each other—they had no choice except to love, will, choose, accept each other—two perfect, identical, intellects could not possibly reject each other—such a thought would be ‘perfect irrationality’. That loving, choosing, willing, accepting of each other is the Holy Spirit, the Will of God, the third person of the Trinity.
What God visualized, imagined, intellectualized, while he existed in the state of singularity, was each and every perfect quantum (particle of energy) of which everything in existence is made, Cumulatively, they represent a reflection of their creator—they are the Son. Since each of those particles is prefect in both form and function, and since each is indistinguishable from its counterparts, and since each is unchanging and unchangeable, they do now, always have, and always will exist in eternity—they are God. It is the Spirit of God, the Holy Spirit (the Will of God, the Acceptance of God, the Love of God, the Choosing of God), which is ‘branded’ onto each particle and keeps each perfect, just as their creator is perfect. That bonding and binding is perfect—an unbreakable force.
Therefore, each of us, everything in existence, and every occurrence of any kind is the direct result of the Will of God. It is impossible for God to hate (reject) anything he has made—God is Prefect Love—God is The Holy Spirit.
The brilliant Jesus recognized that identical philosophy to be absolute truth. Jesus condemned no one—he did cite some for being hypocrites. He said that Love is the only answer—love of God, and love of all others. There are very few places in the written word we have which verify that concept—the two most notable are in Marks Gospel where he ‘spells it out’ with his two commands of love, and in John’s first letter which infers it.
The Jews killed Jesus for his ‘traitorous teaching’. Moreover, those who wrote and rewrote the Bible ad nauseum certainly appear to have tried to hide his teachings, ostensibly, because those teachings negated the writer’s ‘religion cause’. The only place I can find where Jesus freely lays it out, which has been preserved, is in the Coptic Gospel of Thomas. That Gospel, along with many fragments of other Coptic writings, was discovered in a cave near Nag Hammadi, Egypt in 1945. Its content shows it to be contemporary to, or to predate the Canonical writings we have. It was rejected by the Bishops at the First Nicaean Council for obvious reasons—it clearly negated their need ‘to be’—it clearly negates any and all forms of religion. It does, however demonstrate Jesus’ inherent understanding of Triune God—Jesus knew and clearly stated over and over that the Spirit of God was in everybody and everything in existence, including himself. Jesus despised religion and all of its perpetrators. Furthermore, he saw himself as the image of God who was to be the Eternal Sacrifice for all of the evil (selfishness) in our totally selfish temporal universe which his Father had created. Jesus had zeal which is another good synonym for spirit.
The second of my two philosophy books, Peace in Spirituality, clearly spells out the meaning of spirit in Spirituality, and the absolute necessity for universal spirituality before peace can be achieved.
In recognition of that principle, more than two years ago, I called for The World-Wide Communion of Spirituality. So far, I have seen no heedence of that call. Still, there exists a desperate, urgent, need for spiritual union among us all—sadly, I don’t see it happening anytime soon. Nevertheless, the call must be continually propagated so that, sooner or later, hopefully, it will be heard and honored by more and more people. It must become an unrelenting drive and ‘rally cry’ among us—the loving call of spirit—the glue that binds us together— loving acceptance of God and each other.
The word justice has many implications but the one I will address today is retributive. It seems that anywhere in our global society where any form of Christianity prevails, the legal system is based on the biblical concept of justice—an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth. I believe the basis for such determination was the ignorance of how personality is formed. The Jews, from which Christianity sprang through Jesus, seemed to have a firm, self-righteousness about basically everything concerning person and possessions. They, of course, wrote the Old testament, and in that book, they framed their God exactly after themselves. Inevitably, they framed ‘hate’ under the guise of ‘justice’.
I suppose the perpetuation of that ignorance and hate has gone unnoticed and, worse still, unquestioned even today. I have, however, in some of my recent readings, noticed a tendency in some incarceration circles to take a somewhat more sympathetic (loving) attitude toward criminals. As the fields of psychology and psychiatry have been explored and developed more fully, there seems to be inkling of attitude change toward those who break our laws.
No one is born a criminal. They become so through faulty personality development. That recognition is finally gaining traction. The answer lies, not in retributive punishment, but rather in ‘loving’ reprogramming and rehabilitation where possible. We must always hate the crime, but love the criminal–-but for the grace of God, there go I.
Jesus understood that principle exactly—“let him without sin cast the first stone”. The Jews killed Jesus for that philosophy. Worse yet, the entire Christian world which ensued ignored Jesus. We certainly have the right, morally, legally and otherwise to dislike things that others say and do, but I submit to you that we do not have the right to hate anyone under any circumstance—God doesn’t. God is Perfect Love—he accepts everyone of us as we are. That’s exactly what Jesus told us to do—we are to love our God with our all , and we are to love our neighbor as ourselves.
Jesus never heard of psychology, psychiatry, Quantum Mechanics or any developed science—there was none. However, with his genius mind, he could instinctively see though those sciences, not in their specifics, but rather in their implications and applications. Two thousand years ago he told us exactly what we are gradually gleaning today through study and experimentation—1-we all are specific, unique individuals because of our trillions of different life’s experiences, and 2- God is in everything.
Psychology and biology have taught us that we were different even before we were conceived—each sperm and egg carries a different blueprint. In addition, from the moment of conception, each experience of any kind is different for everyone.
Psychiatry and psychoanalytic psychotherapy, engineered and propagated by Sigmund Freud has shown us that it is possible, in willing subjects, to re-train and re-orient our psyches.
Quantum Mechanics has shown us that we and everything in gravid existence are composed ofidentical perfect building blocs called quanta. A quantum is a smallest particle of energy which cannot be subdivided—neither can it be created nor destroyed by us. Knowledge of their perfection lends credence to the acceptance of ‘belief in God’. I have defined the essence of our God thus: God is a Perfect Rational Being. That rationality is shared with all living things. Science is the learning of specific points of God’s perfection. Gradually, we’re ‘catching on’—we’ll never know it all—we’re very imperfect.
Scientific knowledge in those three specific spheres, augmented by others areas of knowledge, helped me formulate the basis for my argument against retributive justice. Obviously, societally deranged people must be incarcerated until and when they can be re-programed and be made ‘fit for society’. Hate must never be the basis for incarceration—physical and or mental abuse as a form of justice must never be allowed or advocated—a loving, supportive , understanding, approach must be our goal always.
In that vein, just today, I posted a story about Amazon removing a booklet written by Scott Hughes, Webmaster for Online Book Club from their sales page. Seemingly, there had been a public outcry by people who had not read the booklet claiming it promoted love of rape and other crimes. It is a totally false claim. Scott asked his friends in Online Book Club to read the booklet free and to share with others. What his booklet does is promote love, even of rapist and other criminals. Furthermore, it strongly advocates against hate. His philosophy seems to coincide with mine
It is the same philosophy that I argue for and espouse in my two little books, Wilderness Cry and Peace in Spirituality. I am certain that if we as a society cannot come to that realization and acceptance soon, we are doomed.
Talk is cheap as they say. I hate just as you do—we all do—we all are imperfect. However we mustmake it a priority to never seek justice in a penal sense, but rather in a sense of loving acceptanceanddetermination to help whenever and whenever possible. That help will come from many sources: societal education about the psychology of personality development; religious retraining, negating the concepts of a vengeful, wrathful God; and support of governmental rehabilitation programs aimed at a more humane management of criminals.
PREDETERMINED–This word refers to ‘the establishment of, or a decision about, something in advance of its occurrence’. We see signs of, and actual events of, predetermination on a regular basis, particularly in the political sphere. When one party controls all three branches of government in the USA, it is a given fact that they can and will do as they please—their only obstacle would be a contestation in the Supreme Court by any objectors.
In the sphere of religion, there seem to be some, maybe many, who believe that God has predetermined everything in their lives including their eternal fate in either heaven or hell. I have to take great exception to that philosophy for one simple reason—God is perfect which means that, among other things, God cannot possibly ‘take sides’. I think the confusion arises in the differential understanding between the concepts of ‘predetermining’ and ‘knowing’. I’ll attempt to explain the difference.
Shortly after publishing my little book, Wilderness Cry, I got a phone call from one of my good Catholic friends. He was in a near-state of convulsion—he requested an immediate audience with me—I readily obliged . About thirty minutes later, I welcomed him into my house—in his hand, he was holding eight type-written pages of questions. As he sat down to a cup of coffee, in a very trembling and excited voice he said ,”You are a determinist”, and I said, “I am a what?” He said, “In your book, you say God has already pre-determined everything that’s going to happen. My reply was a very calm, “You must read my book again more slowly and carefully. I said nothing of the sort. Please allow me to explain”—and explain I did.
I’ll call him Joe for convenience. I said, “Joe there’s a big, big difference between ‘knowing’ what’s going to happen and ‘making’ it happen. Please allow me to explain that difference with a simple example.” I did explain to Joe with a very simple example. I asked him no note his presence in my house. I advised him that I knew for a fact that, sooner or later, one way or another, dead or alive, he was going to leave my house. However, just because I knew that fact, I was not the determiner of that action—more than likely, I would just be a friendly observer.
Joe’s eyes got wide open, and after a moment or two of pause, he excitedly exclaimed, “Oh yea, I get it now. God knows what will happen, but he is not directly making it happen. He’s just a casual observer. Why didn’t I see that when reading your book? That’s exactly what you say. I guess I wasn’t being openminded, as you had suggested, while reading it. You just answered all my questions. Thank you so much.” And with that, he tore the papers in half and placed them in a nearby trash can.
We sat for two more hours discussing the ramifications of my definition of God’s essence—Joe was ecstatic. After another cup of coffee, he excitedly remarked that he couldn’t wait to get home and explain to his wife—and with that, just as I had known, he departed my house—I knew it all along.
God is a Perfect Rational Being . That Rationality imagines all, pervades all, allows all, and observes all. It knows for certain the consequence of each action that has occurred or ever will occur. God’s perfection demands a ‘hands -off’ demeanor and attitude. If he were to interfere, God would be breaking his own rules, which in itself would negate any sense of perfection. Therefore, God cannot possibly be pleased or displeased; he cannot possibly change his own nature—consequently, physical miracles are impossible.
Begging God to ‘make something happen’ that is contrary to his own nature is unwittingly blasphemous. I realize that you, I, and all so-called Christians have been taught to, beg God for all sorts of things. That’s the God of the Jews whom could be bargained with—that is not the Perfect Being who created the perfect building blocks of everything in a universe so vast as to be incomprehensible. That is not the God who exist in eternity—a state of being where no time (change) is possible. If there were change, then there would be time, and eternity would be destroyed—God cannot possibly do that to himself.
So, in summary, we must recognize that the Perfect God who created every perfect tiniest particle of energy, of which every gravid entity is made, and commissioned them with his Will, The Holy Spirit, to remain perfect in both form and function, knows exactly what each has done and will do forever. That is the only determination he ever made. God has not pre-determined any action by anything, but he knows exactly what will be the consequence of any and all actions.
There is a monstrous difference between knowing and causing.
If you have not already read my two little books, Wilderness Cry and Peace in Spirituality, I strongly urge you to do so. If you already have read them, I would encourage you to re-read, and read again and again, if necessary, until you grasp their full meaning. You will find total peace with your God—furthermore you will learn the real identity of your God. He has been known by probably a thousand different names in the past—names such as God, Yahweh, Allah. Brahma, Zeus etc., but his real identity has been hidden by religion. And that, my friends, as Robert Frost said in his famous little poem, The Road Not Taken, “has made all the difference”.—perpetual discord and wars—the word ‘sad’ is totally inadequate to describe our predicament.
In rebuttal or retort you may say, “but we have free will”, and I say, “the will is only free to choose what the intellect presents to it as the better of two choices”. Only in an irrational (insane) person could it be otherwise. Then you may ask why my intellect does not see the same ‘better’ as yours? The answer to that lies in the fact that each intellect has been pre-conditioned by billions of different experiences in its life—therefore, what seems ‘good’ to one intellect may seem ‘not so good’ to another. A simple example—why do some people vote conservative while others vote liberal? The answer lies in how our intellects have been preconditioned by selfish considerations. And I say ‘selfish’ because each time we vote or do anything, we do it with an attitude of what we consider to be in ‘our best interest’. And if we do something which we think is in the best interest of someone else, we wittingly or unwittingly are doing it for a selfish reason of self-satisfaction, or for the purpose of making ‘brownie points’—even Mother Theresa admitted that.
The word ‘believe’ is one of the most commonly used in everyday conversation—I believe this or that. In fact, it is so common as to control the thought processes of most people whom I have observed. It seems to be so ordinary as to dominate many people’s life patterns. A classic example is the widespread belief that the Covid-19 vaccine is intrinsically dangerous. So, lets examine the validity of beliefs.
The first thing that must be done is to define the word ‘belief’. A belief is accepting an idea or concept about something as being true without proof— scientific, philosophical, or otherwise. History has shown that, since the inception of record-keeping, beliefs without proofs have been the most destructive forces civilization has ever known . Likely, a book enumerating all the problems created by ‘false beliefs’ would be too heavy for any individual to lift—and those would just be beliefs imposed on their subjects by Kings, Rulers, Religious Hierarchy, and government agencies of all types.
The afore-mentioned address only large segments of society at any given time. What about personal beliefs? There’s a old, but very true, saying that ‘Perception is Reality’. What that means is that anything we ‘believe’ becomes ‘truth’ for us—factually, it may be, and frequently is, totally false. You may say; what difference does it make, and I would say, everything. Just look at some of the myriad of undesirable consequences—here, again, a book listing them all would be voluminous. Lets examine a few.
Interpersonal relationships are wrecked routinely by false beliefs and or/assumptions about someone else. Many of those false concepts may be based on a prejudicial, stereotypical attitude towards another person’s ‘looks’ or ‘peculiar habits’. A major spinoff of such expressed belief is the prejudicing of others such as friends, children, etc., about that person. In another vein, we see the terrible psychological consequences, particularly instilled into little children, by irrational ‘fear beliefs’—those, so afflicted, frequently become permanently disabled in a given sphere of life and have no understanding of why.
In our ever-day lives, on a moment to moment basis, we are required to make judgements based on ‘beliefs’, without knowing whether or not they are true. For instance, how often do you hear someone say ‘they took or didn’t take a certain road or street’ because of ‘such and such’—their reasoning is usually based on past experience and could be considered justified, but it may be false.
Needless to say, it behooves us to be ‘cautious’ in our beliefs. Past experience plus scientific knowledge are likely the two best supporters for ‘realistic belief’.
Historically, belief in a god (God) has caused more turmoil and strife in society than any other singular entity—the reason being, each person’s god was/is different from everyone’s else. How could that be? It is a known fact that every society in recorded history ‘believed’ in a higher power or god. The problem arose because no one could define the essence of that god. Everyone’s god was different—so, they fought, and fought, and fought. Guess what—they’re still fighting.
Just a reminder—there was a time in the foundation of so-called Christianity, the Catholic Church, that failure to accept a particular belief meant certain torture followed by death on a pile of burning wood. For example, the Church proclaimed the earth to be flat—deny that, and you get burned; sex on any elevated structure meant certain burning because the vibrations from such activity might cause the flat earth to topple off its five crocked, wobbly, legs into the netherworld below; failure to accept the earth as ‘the center of the universe’ meant certain incineration (Galileo story); belief that the ‘Holy Land’ belonged to the Church justified the Crusades and the ensuing slaughter of thousands. One of the most bizarre beliefs was in ‘witches’—even the Protestants partook of that one, and brought it to the New World with hanging of witches before the government stopped the practice.
So here we are today in a world filled with hostility generated by a belief in an unidentified god. However, by the ‘Grace of God’, I have been able to irrefutably identify and define the essence of our God once and for all—God is a Perfect Rational Being. That rationality pervades, and makes and keeps perfect, everything in this universe(s). One has to look into the ultimate limits of creation and existence to understand that Perfection—that is Quantum Mechanics (particle physics).
Most people are educated in the basic understanding of chemistry and classical physics— most understand the basic laws of gravity. That is the visible, palpable, world we live in. Those laws are predicable and trustworthy—we have put a human on the moon as an example. Moreover, there are millions, maybe billions, of examples right in our everyday lives which we take for granted—none of that science was known five hundred years ago—peoples lives were regulated by ‘beliefs’, almost all of which were erroneous and based on the pseudo-science of astrology.
So how is it that I can proclaim the essence of God when I can’t even prove God’s existence. Admittedly, I am required to say ‘I believe” there is God, but here is why I’m justified in saying it. In chemistry, we learn the make-up of basic gravid material. We know that atoms are composed of protons, neutron and electrons—we know that atoms react with each other in various ways to form molecules—we know that molecules act and react with each other in various ways to form basic materials—we know that basic materials can be formulated to assist in the creation of all sorts of objects which we may use in various ways in our daily lives. However, what most people don’t know is what the protons and neutrons are made of—therein lies the basis for my, not only believing (accepting) a concept of God , but , more importantly, being able and mandated to define God’s essence. That field of endeavor is known as Quantum mechanics.
We learn in Quantum Mechanics that protons and neutrons are sub-divisible. They are composed of multiple, indivisible, indistinguishable from each of its kind, particles which are perfect in both form and function. Collectively, they are the smallest particles of energy of which everything is made. Since not a single one of them can be created nor destroyed, and since each is perfect in both form and function (meaning it cannot possibly change), each and all exist in eternity. Each is doing, always has done, and always will do exactly what it was designed to do, and do it perfectly. These particles have names such as electron, quark, boson, photon, to name a few. The knowledge of that universal perfection allowed me to see the ‘Real God’—I had/have a realistic scientific basis for my belief.
Not only do I have a realistic basis for my understanding of God’s essence, but I have a clear picture of the Trinity God. I’ll try to paint that picture for you. Before there was time, God existed in what is known as ‘The Singularity’. With his Perfect Intellect, he reflected upon himself and thereby created a perfect mirror image of himself (the Son). Since both exist in eternity, both are living beings. So what choice would two perfect intellects viewing each other have but to love (chose, accept, will) each other. That perpetual loving, accepting, choosing, willing of each other carries the image of its generators—we call that the Holy Spirit—the Will of God.
God visualized the conversion of his energy into all of those tiny particles which make up everything in our vast universe, and they became his reflection, and he says ‘hum’, I love that, I will that. Therefore, in my assessment, I have proclaimed that the Will of God (The Holy Spirit) is indelibly stamped onto every one of those tiny particles—thereby, they are perfect always. The moment God said, “I will that”, time began. Time is a measure of change. The little particles, themselves, never change, but the stuff they make up is constantly changing and in a perfectly ordered fashion. Everything that has ever happened or that ever will happen is the perfect consequence of all the consequences that went before beginning with the Big Bang—the moment God said ‘I Will that”.
You may say, as I did, “where does Jesus fit into that picture?”. It became instantly obvious to me that Jesus, just as we and everything in existence, are mirror images of God. With his super-human intellect, Jesus saw through the psychology of human, animal, plant, and inanimate existences—he recognized the singular evil of selfishness in all—he saw himself as, not only God’s mirror image, but as a ‘sacrificial lamb’ who must die in atonement for that evil. He knew that love (acceptance) by us, not only of God, but of all creation was necessary for peace and happiness. They killed him for that assessment.
Furthermore, and sadly, no one, to date, has listened to Jesus. Each, in turn, has made a mockery of his teaching. They have ignored his only meaningful words, while, at the same time, distorting his other words. Consequently, we have perpetual turmoil—will we ever learn?—seems, likely, not. My two books, Wilderness Cry and Peace in Spirituality spell out that philosophy precisely. You will obtain ‘objective reasons’ for your beliefs in their reading. However, you must read with an open mind which demands that this problem’s solution, and all problem’s solutions, must begin with the source—in this case with a definition of the essence of God. If you cannot define your God’s essence, your god is a myth.
Just what is selfishness anyway? In my little book, Wilderness Cry, I define selfishness as anything directed at self. That is a very general, and, necessarily all inclusive, definition. I daresay that most people who have been disciplined in almost any ‘religion’ would automatically associate selfishness with their inculcated concept of sin. Certainly, there are degrees of selfishness, just as there are of most things—those extremes have been labeled as ‘sin’.
Also, in my little book, I make, what may seem to many, to be a rather ‘bold’ statement by proclaiming that everything in the universe is evil by virtue of its selfishness. That, of course, brings us to another ‘curve in the road’—just what is ‘evil’? Here again, we have been imbued with the idea that evil must be equilibrated with sin. In truth, those who have led and instructed us have designated anything and everything which seems ‘distasteful’ to us/them as sin. It all started with the chief sin policeman, himself, Moses. That gentleman started the fire with just ten ‘pieces of kindling’. However, the three Abrahamic religions that followed kept ‘loading the wagon’ with sin logs so that even as I speak, the Catechism of the Catholic Church, is constituted of nine hundred, 6″x9″, rather small print, pages of ‘sin kindling’—and the Jews thought they had it bad with a measly 640, or so, laws.
You might ask, what’s the point of all this rambling? I would likely amaze you and possibly even scandalize you by saying “God made it to be that way” for a very specific purpose. Allow me to explain one more time. All gravid creation exists in a time and motion framework. Time, of course in an incremental measure of change. Every living thing is required to do basically the same things—come into existence, stay in existence for a period of time , reproduce, and die—all of that requires change. When any entity dies, it begins the immediate decomposition process. When that process is completed, its basic elemental residue will be assimilated into other objects. That process will occur repeatedly until all return to the unchanging and unchangeable ‘singularity’ which I/we call God, Allah, Buddha, Brahma, Yahweh, etc.—the one and only true God which I have defined as A Perfect Rational Being.
Minus selfishness, which demands change, the universe would stand still—it would exist in eternity. So, in order to function, everything must, by its very natural order, be continually and continuously changing. Furthermore, literally all change involves selfishness—meaning that all change is directed at the appetite of self. Again, in Wilderness Cry, the universality of that selfishness is well elucidated.
In light of the foregoing understanding, it seems imperative that we alter our attitude about the ‘sin’ in selfishness. In a general sense, everything needs food and water, shelter, protection, reproduction, etc. It is the extremes of those fundamental activities that have been decried as ‘sin—that was Moses’ method of dealing with his wayward subjects. I vouch to say that God ‘cares naught’.
God gave all living things instincts and intellects with which to deal with adversity of all kinds—no individual nor group has developed a fool-proof plan yet—I dare say they never will. Everything belongs in the ‘food chain’—sooner or later everything, including us, will become food for something (bacteria, mice, rats, bears, who knows what)—God made it to be that way. In essence, God feeds offhimself.
The founding fathers of our nation, having experienced the tyranny found in other forms of government, recognized that selfishness, bridled by regulatory controls, was the only way humans could govern themselves successfully. So, they devised a constitutional form of government which incentivized each person to become industrious for himself (selfishness), while, at the same time, helping support the ‘common good’ projects such as schools, roads, infrastructure of all kinds, military for defense etc.—they called it Democratic Capitalism. In addition, their system not only allowed for, but encouraged charitable support for the less fortunate. Unfortunately, their record was terribly marred by the blight of slavery. In their defense, they inherited a fourteen thousand year legacy of slavery. Furthermore that legacy was fostered and supported by religion. The world seems for the most part to have come to grips with its ‘wicked ways’, but the remaining scars are wide and deep, and continue to linger, creating smoldering hostilities.
Why then would God create such a selfish universe? I pondered that question long and hard before I came to realize the rather obvious answer. God, actually had a need. He needed to demonstrate his Perfect Love to the world and himself. In the abstract, love is just a concept. Active love requires a lover and a lovee—what greater lovee could God possibly have than an entire universe(s) of evil (selfishness) which he, himself created, and, in which he resides?—enter his son and our brother Jesus. Jesus saw the ‘big picture’—he witnessed the unbridled greed of the king and ‘upper crusts’ of religion. He taught us that love (acceptance) of God and our neighbor was the only way to peace and happiness. So, he graciously accepted the yoke of torment and death so that God and his creation, including you, I , and Jesus, himself, might be exonerated. Could we ever thank him enough? I don’t for one second believe he ‘expects’ any thanks—that would be selfish of him. However, I do believe it would do us some soul-searching good to pause occasionally and say to ourselves; “thank you Jesus”.
So, what’s all the hullaballoo about? Basically, its about religion using our God-instilled instincts to demean and control us all for money, and ’empire building’. We have a system of laws which were enacted for purposes of dealing with extremes of selfishness. We don’t need religion teaching us that we must ‘appease’ an angry God. God is Perfect—there’s no way that any or all, collectively, could please or displease him.
Have you noticed how we are continually shifting the blame onto God—we are perpetually admonished by our priests and preachers to beg God to change something. I’d suggest to you right now, God will not and cannot change anything he has loved (created)—everything will play out to its intended completion. We are the ones who must change our attitude, our way of thinking, and our understanding. We must come to the full realization that the Spirit (WILL) of God exists in every particle of energy of which everything is made—I defined that as spirituality. It is only through the acceptance of that singular, like-minded, concept that peace can ever be achieved.
Yes, we are selfish—God made us that way so that we could live and function in his selfish, ever-changing, ever-evolving universe. That is the method God used/uses to demonstrate his Prefect Love through the death of his mirror image, Jesus.
My call for The World-Wide Communion of Spirituality continues—it is our only hope for peace.